Initial Growth of Physalis peruviana L. Seedlings on Different Substrates

Main Article Content

Jeniffer Ribeiro de Oliveira
Mayara Nascimento Santos
Joabe Martins de Souza
Vinícius de Souza Oliveira
Mariana Alexandre Alves Amourim

Abstract

The substrate is one of the most important factors in the formation of the seedling and must present conditions suitable for germination and development of the seedling root system. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of different substrates on the initial growth of Physalis peruviana L. seedlings. The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Farm, of the Federal University of Espírito Santo– São Mateus (Brazil). The experimental design used was completely randomized, with three treatments (Soil, Provaso® and Bioplant®), seven replications and seven plants per plot, using seeds with 427 days of storage. At 56 days after sowing, the 10 most vigorous seedlings were selected for evaluation. The following characteristics were evaluated: percentage of emergence, emergence speed index (ESI), mean time of emergence (MET), number of leaves (NL), stem diameter (SD), aerial part length (APL), aerial part fresh matter (APFM), aerial part dry matter (APDM), root fresh matter (RFM), root dry matter (RDM) and Dickson quality index (DQI). The Provaso® substrate showed the best performance in all studied variables, being recommended for the production of Physalis seedlings.

Keywords:
Emergence speed, greenhouse, seedling quality, seminiferous propagation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Oliveira, J. R. de, Santos, M. N., Souza, J. M. de, Oliveira, V. de S., & Amourim, M. A. A. (2020). Initial Growth of Physalis peruviana L. Seedlings on Different Substrates. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 32(8), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2020/v32i830310
Section
Original Research Article

References

Rodrigues E, Rockenbach II, Cataneo C, Gonzaga LV, Chaves ES, Fett R. Minerals and essential fatty acids of the exotic fruit Physalis peruviana L. Food Science and Technology. 2009;29(3):642-645.

Rufato A de R, Rufato L, Lima CSM, Muniz J. Technical aspects of the culture of physalis. Lages: CAV / UDESC; Pel; 2008.

Fischer G, Melgarejo LM. The ecophysiology of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) - an Andean fruit crop. A review. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas. 2020;14(2).

Lima CSM, Severo J, Manica-Bento R, Silva JA, Rufato L, Rufato AR. Chemical characteristics of cape-gooseberry fruits in different sepal colors and training systems. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura. 2009;31(4):1060-1068.

Fischer G, Miranda D, Piedrahíta W, Romero J. Avances en cultivo, poscosecha y exportación de lauchuva (Physalis peruviana L.) em Colombia. Bogotá; 2005.

Peixoto JR. Efeito da matéria orgânica, do superfosfato simples e do cloreto de potássio na formação de mudas de maracujazeiro-azedo (Passiflora edulis Sims f. flavicarpa); 1986.

Minami K, Puchala B. Produção de mudas de hortaliças de alta qualidade. Horticultura Brasileira. 2000;18:162-163.

Lima CSM, Vilanova DS, Gonçalves MA, Rufato L, Rufato ADR. Pequenas frutas e frutas nativas do Mercosul. Anais, Pelota. 2010;180-181.

Fachinello JC, Hoffmann A, Natchigal JC. Propagação de plantas frutíferas. Brasília: Embrapa Technological Information; 2005.

Thiel FB, Gonçalves MA, Carpenedo S, Vignolo GK, Picolotto, L, Antunes, LEC. Desenvolvimento inicial de mudas de Physalis submetidas a diferentes substratos. In: XXII Congresso Brasileiro De Fruticultura, 2012, Bento Gonçalves. Anais. 2012;1-4.

Braun H, Cavatte PC, Amaral JAT de, Amaral JFT do, Reis EF dos. Tomato seedling production by cuttings rooted in different substrates. Idesia. 2010;28(1):9-15.

Chaves AC. Propagação e avaliação fenológica de Physalis sp. na região de Pelotas – RS; 2006.

Carvalho NM, Nakagawa J. Sementes: Ciência, tecnologia e produção. 5th Ed. Jaboticabal: FUNEP; 2012.

Dickson A, Leaf AL, Hosner JF. Quality appraisal of white spruce and white pine seedling stock in nurseries. Forest Chronicle. 1960;36(1):10-13.

Ferreira DF, Ferreira D, Ferreira DJ, Ferreira DF, Ferreira FS, Ferreira D. SISVAR-Sistema de análise de variância. Versão 5.3; 2010.

Almeida RN de, Ferraz DR, Silva AS, Cunha EG, Vieira JC, Souza T da S, Berilli SDS. Use of tannery sludge in complementation to the commercial substrate in the production of pepper seedlings. Scientia Agraria. 2017;18(1):20-33.

Santos PLF dos, Silva ONM da, Paixão AP, Castilho RMM de. Germinação e desenvolvimento de mudas de tomateiro cereja em diferentes substratos. Tecnologia & Ciência Agropecuária. 2017;11(5):41-45.

Kuhn PR, Kulczynski SM, Bellé C, Koch F, Werner CJ. Initial development of seedlings physalis (Physalis peruviana) through the seeds of fruits mature and green under different substrates. Enciclopédia Biosfera. 2012;8(15):1378-1385.

Cogo MR de M, Barbosa FMB, Souza LB de, Coelho APD, Frescura VD. Produção de mudas de Solanum betaceum Cav. e Physalis angulata L. em diferentes substratos. Enciclopédia Biosfera. 2013;9(16):1806-1813.

Costa KD da S, Carvalho IDE, Ferreira PV, Silva J, Teixeira JS. Avaliação de substratos alternativos para a produção de mudas de alface. Revista Verde. 2012;7(5):58-62.

Lima CJG, Oliveira F de A de, Medeiros JF de, Olesiira MKT de, Galvão D de C. Evaluation of different trays and organic substrata in the production of seedlings of cherry-colored tomato. Revista Ciência Agronômica. 2009;40(1):123-128.

Cerqueira FB, Freitas GA, Maciel CJ, Carneiro JSS, Leite RC. Produção de mudas de tomate cv. Santa cruz em diferentes substratos. Journal of Bioenergy and Food Science. 2015;2(2):39-45.

Díaz LA, Fischer G, Pulido SP. Coco peat as a substitute for peat moss in the production of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) seedlings. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas. 2010;4(2):143-152.

Kwabiah AB, Palm CA, Stoskopf NC, Voroney RP. Response of soil microbial biomass dynamics to quality of plant materials with emphasis on P availability. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 2003;35(2): 207-216.

Vignolo GK, Kunde RJ, Picolotto L, Carpenedo S, Gonçalves MA, Antunes EC. Influência do tamanho das sementes e substrato na formação de mudas de pitangueira. Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado; 2010. (Comunicado Técnico, 232).

Marinho PHQ, Sousa RM de, Giongo M, Viola MR, Souza PB de. Influence of different substrates on seedling production in the flamboyant Delonix regia (Bojer ex Hook) Raf. Revista Agro @ mbiente On-line. 2017;11(1):40-46.

Caldeira MVW, Delarmelina WM, Lübe SG, Gomes DR, Gonçalves E de O, Alves AF. Biosolids in composition of substrate for Tectona grandis Linn. F. seedlings production. Revista Floresta. 2012;42(1): 77-84.

Azevedo IMG de, Alencar RM de, Barbosa AP, Almeida NO de. Study of growth and quality of marupá (Simarouba amara Aubl.) nursery seedlings. Acta Amazonica. 2010;40(1):157-164.

Hunt GA. Effect of styroblock design and cooper treatment on morphology of conifer seedlings. In: Target Seedling Symposium, Meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations, General Technical Report RM-200. 1990;218-222.