Genetic Variability in Physiological Seed Quality of Maize Genotypes of Different Maturity Groups

Main Article Content

J. O. Olasoji
D. J. Ogunniyan


A study was conducted to investigate genetic variability in physiological seed quality using viability and vigour tests which were conducted at the seed testing laboratory of Institute of Agricultural Research and Training (IAR&T), Moor Plantation, Ibadan.  The investigational materials consisted of twelve genotypes of maize of different maturity-early, intermediate and late collected from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan and IAR&T, Moor Plantation, Ibadan, respectively.  The experimental design used was completely randomize design (CRD) and data was collected for some viability and vigour traits and the data collected were subjected to analysis of variance. Significant differences were found among all the maize genotypes for the characters under observation. Hundred seed weight ranged from 24.6-29.3 g, 18.5-26.6 g, 22.9-29.1 g, standard germination ranged from 54.0-100.0%, 16.0-92.0%, 50.0-100% and accelerate ageing germination also ranged from 6.0-96.0%, 7.0-84.0%, 0-90.0% in the early, intermediate and late- maturing genotypes, respectively. Conductivity ranged from 5.34-17.10 µS/cm/g, 13.7-91.7 µS/cm/g and7.06-33.6 µS/cm/g with mean values of 11.14, 39.23 and 14.05 µS/cm/g in the early, intermediate and late-maturing genotypes, respectively. Variability was smaller in the late-maturing genotypes for Root Number (RN) and Shoot Length (SLT) but higher for both early and late- maturing genotypes. It was concluded from this study that seeds of early-maturing genotypes had significantly higher physical and physiological quality parameters.  All the early materials used for the study tend to be homogenous for all the traits measured and selection should be practiced for hundred seed weight to increase yield potential in maize varieties.

Genetic variability, viability, vigour, homogenous, ageing.

Article Details

How to Cite
Olasoji, J. O., & Ogunniyan, D. J. (2020). Genetic Variability in Physiological Seed Quality of Maize Genotypes of Different Maturity Groups. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 32(17), 1-10.
Original Research Article


Yadav VK. Singh IS. Comparative evaluation of maize inbred lines (Zea mays L.) according to DUS testing using morphological, physiological and molecular markers. Agricultural Science. 2010;1(3): 131-142.

Bello OB Abdulmaliq SY Afolabi MS Ige SA.Correlation and path coefficient analysisof yield and agronomic characters among open pollinated maize varieties andtheir F1 hybrids in a diallel cross. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2010;9: 2633-2639.

Ajayi SA. Current trends in seed science - Implications for sub-Sahara Africa. African Crop Science Proceedings. 2007;8:79-85.

TeKrony DM, Egli DB, Wickham DA. Corn seed vigor effect on no- tillage field performance. Crop Science. 1989;29: 1523-1528.

Finch-Savage WE, Leubner- Metzger G. Seed dormancy and control ofgermination. New Phytologist. 2006;171:501-523.

Finch-Savage WE, Bassel GN. Seed vigour and crop establishment: Extending Performance beyond adaptation. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2015;67:562-7-591.

Moterle LM, Braccini AL, Scapim CA, Pinto RJB, Gonçalves LSA, Amaral Junior AT, Silva TRC. Combining ability of tropical maize lines for seed quality and agronomic traits. Genetics and Molecular Research. 2011;10(3):2268-2278.

Hampton JG. What is seed quality? Seed Science and Technoology. 2002;30:1-10.

Marcos-Filho J. Teste de envelhecimento acelerado. In: Krzyzanowski FC, Vieira RD, França-Neto JB. (Ed.). Vigor de sementes: Conceitos e testes. Londrina: Abrates, cap. 1999;3:1-24.

Prete CEC, Guerra EP. Qualidade fisiológica de sementes. In: Destro, D and Montalvan R. (Eds.) Melhoramento genético de plantas. Londrina: UEL, 1999; 659-674.

Gondim TCO, Rocha VSR, Santos MM, Miranda GV. Avaliação da qualidade fisiológica de sementes de milho-crioulo sob estresse causado por baixo nível de nitrogênio. Revista Ceres. 2006;53:413-417.

Mertz LM, Henning FA, Cruz HL, Meneghello GE, Ferrari CS, Zimmer PD. Diferenças Estruturais entre tegumentos de sementes de soja com permeabilidade ntrastante. Revista Brasileira de Sementes. 2009;31(1):23-29.

Cruz CD, Regazzi AJ, Carneiro PCS. Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. v.1, 3.ed., Viçosa: UFV. 2004;480.

Tahir M, Tanvier A, Ali A, Abbas M, Wasaya A. Comparative yield performance of different maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids under local conditions of Faisalabad- Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Life Social Science. 2008;6(2):118-120.

Hussain N, Hayat K, Zubair M, Aziz A, Zaman Q. Adaptability of maize varieties to D.I. Khan ecology. Indian Journal of Plant Science. 2005;4(2):191-195.

ISTA. International rules for seed testing. Seed Science and Technology.1993; 21(suppl.).

Hampton JG, TeKrony DM. Handbook of seed testing vigor test methods. Zurich, International Seed Testing Association; 1999.

SAS Institute. SAS/STAT user’s guide, Version 8, SAS Inst., Inc., Carg; 2002.

Woltz J, TeKrony D. Accelerated aging test for corn seed. Seed Technology. 2001; 23:21-34.

Olasoji JO, Akande SR, Owolade OF. Genetic variability in seed quality of African yambeans (Sphenostylis stenocarpa Hochst. Ex A. Rich Harm). African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2011;6(27): 5848-5853.

Mahesha CR, Channaveeraswami AS, Kurdikeri MB, Shekhargouda M. Merwade MN. Storability of sunflower seeds harvested at different maturity dates. Seed Research. 2001;29:98-102.

Hampton JG. Vigor testing within laboratories of the international seed testing association: A survey. Seed Science and Technology. York. The Haworth Press Inc. 1992;20(supplement): 199-203.

Wang YR, Hampton JG. Seed vigor and storage in ‘’Grasslands Pawera‟ red clover. Plant Varieties and Seeds. 1991;4: 61-66.

Jahufer MZZ, Borovoi VV. The effect of mechanical damage to maize (Zea mays L.) seed germination, seed morphology and subsequent grain yield. Journal of applied seed production.1992;10:67-77.

Verma SS, Verma U, Tomer RPS. Studies on seed quality parameters in deteriorating seeds in Brassica (Brassica campestris).Seed Science and Technology 2003;31:389-396.