Evaluation of Selected Zambian Popular Sweet Potato Genotypes for Response to Sweet Potato Virus Disease

Main Article Content

Joseph Banda
Patrick Chiza Chikoti
Langa Tembo


Aim: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of sweet potato virus disease (SPVD) on the beta carotene content, tuber weight and vine weight of selected popular sweet potato genotypes.

Study Design: The experiment was laid as a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications.

Place and Duration of Study: The experiment was conducted for two cropping seasons (2015/16 and 2016/17) at the Zambia Agriculture Research Institute in Chilanga district of Zambia.

Methodology: The uninfected (control) genotypes of Kanga, Chiwoko and Chingovwa were evaluated alongside their SPVD infected genotypes. Genotypic infection was confirmed using molecular approaches, and data was collected at harvest on beta carotene content, tuber weight and vine weight.

Results: The results showed that SPVD affects the yield and beta carotene content of sweet potato. Significant differences (P< .001) for yield performance and beta carotene were observed. The yield reduction in percentage across seasons for all genotypes between the uninfected and infected genotypes ranged from 77% to 79% and 67% to 76% for tuber weight and vine weight respectively. Only Chiwoko exhibited higher levels of beta carotene among the genotypes. However, the SPVD infected Chiwoko genotype compared to the uninfected treatment produced mean beta carotene content of 39.1 µg/g and 91.5 µg/g respectively.

Conclusion: SPVD reduces the tuber weight, vine weight and beta carotene content in infected sweet potato genotypes.

Ipomoea batatas, sweet potato feathery mottle virus, sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus, beta carotene, yield.

Article Details

How to Cite
Banda, J., Chikoti, P. C., & Tembo, L. (2020). Evaluation of Selected Zambian Popular Sweet Potato Genotypes for Response to Sweet Potato Virus Disease. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 32(17), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2020/v32i1730385
Original Research Article


International potato centre (C.I.P); 2010. Available:http://www.cipotato.org/sweetpotato [Accessed 20 November 2016].

FAO. FAOSTAT. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy; 2017.

Antiabong E, Bassey E. Characterization and evaluation of six sweet potato varieties for quantitative and qualitative characters and tolerance to Cylas puncticollis, both in high and low humid environments of southeastern Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture Research. 2009;4: 17-21.

Luban TF, Peace K, Robert M, Maggiore K, Hellen M, Muhumuza J. Participatory agronomic performance and sensory evaluation of selected range-fleshed sweet potato varieties in southwestern Uganda. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research. 2015;15: 25-30.

Johnson M, Pace RD. Sweet potato leaves: properties and synergistic interactions that promote health and prevent disease. Nutrition Reviews. 2012; 68:604-615.

Hazra P, Chattopadhyay A, Karmakar K. Dutta S. Sweet potato. In: Modern technology in vegetable production. New Delhi: New India Publishing Agency. 2011; 358-370.

Lebot V. Root and Tuber Crops - Sweet Potato. Handbook of plant breeding. New York: Springer Science Business Media. 2010;97-126.

Mekonnen B, Tulu S, Nego J. Orange fleshed sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) varieties evaluated with respect to growth parameters at jimma in Southwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Agronomy. 2015;14: 164-169.

Mark GL, Dean AK. Air temperature affects biomass and carotenoid pigment accumulation in Kale and Spinach grown in controlled environment. Plant sciences department, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Horticulture Science. 2005; 40(7):2026-2029.

Mukasa SB, Rubaihayo PR, Valkonen JPT. Incidence of viruses and virus-like diseases of sweet potato in Uganda. Plant disease 87,329–35. Journal of Plant Diseases. 2003;87:329-335.

Parthasarathy S, Thiribhuvanamala G, Prabakar K. Diseases of field crops and their management. London: CRC Press; 2020.

Tembo L, Asea G, Gibson PT, Okori P. Assessment of Uganda’s farmers’ perception and knowledge on maize cob rots towards breeding for resistance. Journal of Agriculture and Crops. 2016; 2:1-8.

Chilipa LNK, Lungu DM, Tembo L. Multiple race inoculation as an option in breeding for resistance to C. lindemuthianum in common beans. Journal of Agriculture and Crops. 2016;2:45-50.

Tembo L, Asea G, Gibson PT, Okori P. Resistance breeding strategy for Stenocarpella maydis and Fusarium graminearum cob rots in tropical maize. Journal of Plant Breeding. 2013;132:83-89.

Mukasa SB, Rubaihayo PR, Valkonen JPT. Interactions between a crinivirus, an ipomovirus and a potyvirus in co-infected sweet potato plants. Plant pathology. 2006;55:458-467.

Tairo F, Jones RAC, Valkonen JPT. Potyvirus complexes in sweetpotato: Occurrence in Australia, serological and molecular resolution, and analysis of the sweet potato virus 2 (SPV2) component. Journal of Plant Diseases. 2006;90:1120–1128.

Kapinga RS, Tumwengamire J, Ndunguru JS. Catalogue of orange-fleshed sweet potato varieties for sub-Saharan Africa. Lima, Peru: International Potato Centre; 2009.

Lodhi MA, Guang-Ning Y, Weeden N, Fand Reisch BI. A simple and efficient method for DNA extraction from grapevine cultivars and vitis species. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 1994;12:6-13.

Fenby NS, Seal SE, Gibson RW, Foster GD. RNA extraction from virus diseased sweet potato for RT-PCR analysis. Journal of Molecular Biotechnology. 1998;10:187–90.

Alicai T, Fenby NS, Gibson RW, Adipala E, Vetten, HJ, Foster GD, Seal SE. Occurrence of two serotypes of sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus in East Africa and their associated differences in coat protein and HSP70 homologue gene sequence. Plant pathology. 1999;48:718-726.

Tairo F, Mukasa SB, Jones RAC, Kullaya A, Rubaihayo PR, Valkonen JPT. Unraveling the genetic diversity of the three main viruses involved in Sweet Potato Virus Disease (SPVD) and its implications. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2005; 6:199-211.

Radriguez – Amaya DB, Kimura M. Harvest Plus handbook for carotenoid analysis. Washington, DC and Cali Columbia: Harvestplus Technical Monograph; 2004.

Karyeija RF, Gibson RW, Valkonen JPT. Comparisons of coat protein gene sequences show that East African isolates of sweet potato feathery mottle virus form a genetically distinct group. Archives of Virology. 2000;145:567-74.

Adiniki S, Mukasa SB, Mwanga ROM, Gibson RW. Effects of sweet potato feathery mottle virus and sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus on the yield of sweet potato in Uganda. Journal of Phytopathology. 2015;164:242–254.

Ling LDE, Goszczynski JR, McFerson, Gonsalves D. Nucleotide sequence and genome organization of grapevine leafroll associated virus-2 are similar to beet yellows virus, the closterovirus type member. Journal of General Virology. 1998;82:1-7.

Carroll HW, Villordon AQ, Clark CA, La Bonte DR Hoy MW. Studies on beauregard sweet potato clones naturally infected with viruses. International Journal of Pest Management. 2003;50: 101–106.

Zhao J, Zhang X, Hong Y, Liu Y. Chloroplast in plant-virus Interaction. Front. Journal of Microbiology. 2016;7:15-65.

Chiona M, Shanahan P, Mwala M. Experience with hand pollination of sweet potato in Zambia. Biotechnology, Breeding and Seed Systems for African Crops; 2007.