Influence of Sulphur and Spacing on Yield Attributes and Economics of Toria (Brassica campestris L.)

Bhawna Soni *

Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, (U.P), India.

Rajesh Singh

Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, (U.P), India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2022 at the Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj (U.P.) India. To study the Response of Sulphur and Spacing on growth and yield of Toria. The treatments consist of Sulphur 15, 30, 45 kg/ha, and Spacing 20×15, 20×20, 25×20 cm. There were 10 treatments each replicated thrice. The soil of experimental plot was sandy loamy in texture, nearly neutral in soil reaction (pH 7.2) with EC-0.187 (dS/m), available N (178.48 kg/ha). Results revealed that highest number of siliquae/plant (216.19), seeds/ siliquae (23.67), test weight (3.64 gm), seed yield (1756.67 kg/ha), stover yield (3206.67 kg/ha) and harvest index (35.39 %) were recorded with application of Sulphur 45 kg/ha + Spacing 25×20 cm. Maximum gross returns (INR 96,580.00/ha), net returns (INR 66,045.00/ha) and B:C ratio (2.16) were also recorded in treatment-9 (Sulphur 45 kg/ha + Spacing 25×20 cm).

Keywords: Sulphur, spacing, toria, yield attributes and economics


How to Cite

Soni , B., & Singh , R. (2023). Influence of Sulphur and Spacing on Yield Attributes and Economics of Toria (Brassica campestris L.). International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 35(14), 298–303. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i143049

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Downey RK. Brassica oil seed: breeding achievements and opportunities. Plant Bre. Abst. 1990;60:1165-1169.

Anonymous. Economic Survey of Pakistan 2016-17. Agriculture. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan; 2017.

Amjad M. Oil seed crops of Pakistan. Pakistan Agricultural Research Council Islamabad, (PARC). 2014;1-59.

Tandon HLS, Messick DL. Practical Sulphur Guide, Sulphur Institute, Washington D.C., U.S.A. 2002;70-75.

Tandon HLS. Sulphur Fertilizers for Indian Agriculture– A Guide Book. Fertilizer Development and Consultation Organization, New Delhi. The Sulphur Institute, Washington D.C., U.S.A; 1995.

Hegde DM. Sudhakara Babu SN. Declining factor productivity and improving nutrient use efficiency in oilseeds. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 2009;54(1):1-8.

Diepen Brock W. Yield analysis of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): A review. Field Crops Research. 2000;67:35-49.

Ali Y, Hag M, Tahir GR, Ahmad N. Effect of inter and intra row spacing on the yield and yield components of chickpea. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 1999;2:305-307.

Svecnjak Z, Varga B, Butorac J. Yield components of apical and subapical ear contributing to the grain yield responses of prolific maize at high and low plant populations. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2006;192: 37-42.

Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Three or more factor experiment. In: Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research 2nd Edition. 1976;139-141.

Saini LB, Kakraliya M, Kumar P. Effects of different levels of NPK and Sulphur on growth and yield attributes of rapeseed (Brassica campestris var. toria). 2020;9(9). Available:http://www.ijcmas.com,

Ramanathan SP, Chandrashekharan B.. Effect of nipping, plant geometry and fertilizer on summer sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Indian Journal of Agronomy. 1998;43(2):329-332.

Nath S, Patel BT, Meena O, Jat GP. Effect of phosphorus and Sulphur on yield attributes, yield and economics of mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2018;7(5):438-500.

Chauhan ZY, Patel DK, Bhabhor K. Effect of Nitrogen, phosphorus and Sulphur on yield, nutrient uptake and soil fertility after harvest of mustard (Brassica juncea L.). International Journal of Current. Microbiology and Applied. Sciences. 2020; 9(6):3506-3512.

Sahoo GC, Santra GH, Biswas PK, Mishra S. Influence of doses and source of sulphur on yield, quality and economics of mustard (Brassica campestris var. toria) in red soil of Odisha. Annals of Plant and Soil Research. 2018;20(1):46-51.

Beenish O, Singh R, Lal EP. Impact of nutrient management system on growth, yield and quality of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cv. Rani variety. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2019;8:4391-4394.

Shekhawat K, Rathore SS, Premi OP, Kandpal BK, Chuhan JS. Advances in agronomic management of Indian mustard: An Overview. International Journal of Agronomy. 2012;20:12-14.

Kumar R, Trivedi SK. Effect of levels and source of sulphur on yield, quality and nutrient uptake by mustard (Brassica juncea). Progressive Agriculture; 2012; 12(1):69-73.

Kumar S, Yadav DS. Effect of sulphur and zinc on yield and nutrient uptake of maize (Zea mays). Indian Journal of Agronomy. 2007;52(2):116-118.

Famda L, Singh D, Jat L. Effect of phosphorus and sulphur nutrient on Brassica campestris L. variety toria under dry land condition. Asian Journal of Environmental Science. 2017;12(1):69-82.