Impact of Nano DAP and Zn EDTA on Cowpea Growth and Yield

Balachandrakumar V. *

Department of Agronomy, Gandhigram Rural Institute-624302, Dindigul-624302, Tamil Nadu, India.

K. Sowmiya

School of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Gandhigram Rural Institute-624302, Dindigul-624302, Tamil Nadu, India.

M. Shofiya

School of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Gandhigram Rural Institute-624302, Dindigul-624302, Tamil Nadu, India.

K. Gopika

School of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Gandhigram Rural Institute-624302, Dindigul-624302, Tamil Nadu, India.

M. Nithika

School of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Gandhigram Rural Institute-624302, Dindigul-624302, Tamil Nadu, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Pulses are gaining more important position in Indian Agriculture.But the average productivity of pulses (764 kg ha-1) is much less productive than the global average (848 kg ha-1).To increase its productivity application of important fertiliser to cowpeas during their critical growth stages is aeffective strategy to enhance their yield. Especially smart fertilizers like Nano Di-ammonium Phosphate (DAP) and Zinc Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic acid (Zn EDTA) are very helpful in that.  Therefore, the field experiment was done in the dairy Farm, School of Agriculture and Animal Science, Gandhigram Rural Institute, Gandhigram, Tamil Nadu during January 2024 to March2024 to assess the impact of Nano DAP and Zn EDTA on growth and yield of cowpea. It was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with seven treatments under three replications. Among the different treatments, Recommended Dosage of Fertilizers (RDF) 50% Phosphorus, 100% Nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) + Seed treatment and two foliar sprays of 0.2% of Nano Di-ammonium Phosphate (DAP)+ Foliar spray of 3% Zinc Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic acid (Zn EDTA)(T7) achieved supremely improved growth parameters like plant height, no.of branches per plant, leaf area index, dry matter production, and yield attributes viz., pod length, no.of pods per plant , no.of seeds per pod and test weight . Further it recorded a higher seed yield,haulm yield and harvest index. The minimum value was recorded under control treatment (T1).Experimental results clearly revealed that RDF 50% P, 100% NK + Seed treatment and two foliar sprays of 0.2% of Nano DAP + Foliar spray of 3% Zn EDTA(T7)  has recorded the highest yield of 1720 kg ha-1.

Keywords: Nano DAP, ZnEDTA, cowpea, yield

How to Cite

Balachandrakumar V., Sowmiya , K., Shofiya, M., Gopika , K., & Nithika , M. (2024). Impact of Nano DAP and Zn EDTA on Cowpea Growth and Yield. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 36(6), 317–326.


Download data is not yet available.


Damoar K, Sharma RK, Maida P. Response of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) varieties to under Malwa region of Madhya Pradesh. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2020;9(2):1749-1753.

Ponniya Vijay, Anil Choudhary K, Anchal Dass, Bana RS, Rana KS, Rana DS, Tyagi VK, Puniya MM. Improved crop management practices for sustainable pulse production: An Indian perspective. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2015;85:747-458.

Ministry of agriculture and farmers welfare-Directorate of pulses development- Annual report; 2021-2022.

FAO. World food and Agriculture-Statistical year book; 2022.

Dodiya S, Pisal R, Chaudhary K, Gohil V. Agronomic study on cowpea growth and yield influenced by PGRs and foliar nutrition. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2023;12(12):2757-2761.

Haruna IM, Aliyu L. Yield and economic returns of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) as influenced by poultry manure, nitrogen and phosphorus at Samaru, Nigeria. Elixir Agric. 2011;39:4884-4887.

Vandana Nandal, Manu Solanki. The Zn as a vital micronutrient in plants. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences. 2021;11(3):4026.

Yasser E, El-Ghobashy, Elmehy AA, El-Douby KA. Influence of Intercropping Cowpea with some maize hybrids and N nano mineral fertilization on productivity in salinity soil. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy. 2020;42(1):63-78.

Gupta SP, Mohapatra S, Mishra J, Yadav SK, Verma S, Singh S. Effect of nano nutrient on growth attributes, yield, Zn content, and uptake in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). International Journal of Environment and Climate Change. 2022;12(11):2028-2036.

Hagagg LF, Mustafa NS, Genaidy EAE, El-Hady ES. Effect of spraying nano-NPK on growth performance and nutrients status for (Kalamat cv.) olive seedling. Bioscience Research. 2018;15:1297-1303.

Sudha S, Stalin P. Effect of zinc on yield, quality and grain zinc content of rice genotypes. International Journal of Farm Sciences. 2015;5(3):17-27.

Sreenivasa RN. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) response to time and method of zinc application. M.Sc. (Ag) thesis submitted to Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad, India; 2003.

Venkatesh M, Babu KK, Prasanth P, Lakshminarayana D, Kumar SP. Study on effect of different levels of nitrogen in combination with nano urea on growth and yield of marigold (Tageteserecta L.) Cv. PusaNarangiGainda. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2022;11(11):1313-13 17.

Assuero, SG., Mollier, A., Pellerin, S. The decrease in growth of phosphorus‐deficient maize leaves is related to a lower cell production. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2004;27(7):887-895.

Sharma SK, Sharma PK, Rameshwar LM, Sharma V, Chaudhary R, Pandey R. Effect of foliar application of nano-urea under different nitrogen levels on growth and nutrient content of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.). International Journal of Plant and Soil Science. 2022;34(20):149-155.

Juthery, H., HilalObaid Al-Maamouri E. Effect of urea and nano-nitrogen fertigation and foliar application of nano-boron and molybdenum on some growth and yield parameters of potato. Al-Qadisiyah, Journal for Agriculture Sciences. 2020;10 (1):253-263.

Sruthy H, Pillai PS, Shimi GJ, Bindhu JS, Sajeena A. Growth and yield of grain cowpea (Vignaunguiculata sub sp. Cylindrica) in Response to foliar nutrition and graded levels of phosphorus and potassium. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change.2023; 13(11): 4001-4014.

Manikandan A, Subramanian KS. Evaluation of zeolite based nitrogen nano-fertilizers on maize growth, yield and quality on inceptisols and alfisols. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 2016; 9(4):1-9.

Rashmi CM, Prakash SS. Effect of nano phosphorus fertilizers on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in central dry zone of Karnataka. Mysore J. Agric. Sci. 2023; 57(2):286-293 .

Vaghar MS, Sayfzadeh S, Zakerin HR, Kobraee S, Valadabadi SA. Foliar application of iron, zinc and manganese nano-chelates improves physiological indicators and soybean yield under water deficit stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2020;43(18):2740-2756.

Manjunath Gondi. Effect of nano nutrients on growth, seed yield and quality in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. M.Sc (Agri) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., GKVK, Bengaluru; 2018.

Poudel A, Singh SK, Jiménez-Ballesta R, Jatav SS, Patra A, Pandey A. Effect of nano-phosphorus formulation on growth, yield and nutritional quality of wheat under semi-arid climate. Agronomy. 2023;13 (3):768.

Arif U, Hussain S, Shah SZA, Hamid A, Yaqoob A, Arif AA, Muneer N. Interactive effect of phosphorus and zinc on the growth, yield and nutrient uptake of garlic (Allium sativum L.) variety Gulabi. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences. 2016;4(5).

Meena RH, Jat G, Jain D. Impact of foliar application of different nano-fertilizers on soil microbial properties and yield of wheat. J. Environ. Biol. 2021;42:302–308.

Kumari MS, Rao PC, Padmaja G, Ramulu V, Saritha JD, Ramakrishna K. Effect of bio and nano phosphorus on yield, yield attributes and oil content of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea. L). Environment Conservation Journal. 2017;18(3):21-26.

Barua D, Saikia M. Agronomic biofortification in rice varieties through zinc fertilization under aerobic condition. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2018;52(1):89-92.

Beebout SJ, Francis HCR, Dennis SJT, Ranee CM. Reasons for variation in rice (Oryza sativa) grain zinc response to zinc fertilization. In 3rd International Zinc Symposium. 2011;10-14).

Manjili MJ, Bidarigh S, Amiri E. Study on effect of foliar application of nano chelate molybdenum fertilizer on yield and yield components of peanut. Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. 2014; 5(1):67-71.

Abdelghany AM, El-Banna AA, Salama EA, Ali MM, Al-Huqail AA, Ali HM, Lamlom SF. The individual and combined effect of nanoparticles and biofertilizers on growth, yield, and biochemical attributes of peanuts (Arachis hypogea L.). Agronomy. 2022;12(2):398.

Michail T, Walter T, Astrid W, Walter G, Dieter G, Maria SJ. A survey of foliar mineral nutrient concentrations of Pinus canariensis at field plots in Tenerife. Forest. Ecol. Manag .2004;189:49-55.

Channabasappa KS., Madiwalar SL, Manjappa K, Patil SK. Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity of rice-cowpea cropping system under low land hill region. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 2004;17(3):623-625.

Pandey N, Gupta B. Improving seed yield of black gram (Vigna mungo L. var. DPU-88-31) through foliar fertilization of zinc during the reproductive phase. Journal of Plant Nutrition,2012;35(11):1683-1692.

Amirnia, R., Bayat, M., Tajbakhsh, M. Effects of nano fertilizer application and maternal corm weight on flowering at some saffron (Crocus sativus L.) ecotypes. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 2014;19(2):158-168.

El-Azizy FA, Habib AAM. Effect of nano phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on productivity and mineral content of broad bean in North Sinai. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering. 2021;12(4):239-246.

Nkaa, F., Nwokeocha, O. W., Ihuoma, O. Effect of phosphorus fertilizer on growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences. 2014;9(5):74-82.

Bhargavi G, Sundari A. Effect of nano urea on the growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa) under SRI in the cauvery delta zone of Tamil Nadu. Crop Research. 2023;58(1and2): 12-17.

Chinnappa SA, Krishnamurthy D, Ajayakumar MY, Ramesha YM, Ravi S. Response of nano fertilizers on growth, yield and economics of kharif sorghum. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2023; 12(9):761-765.

Cakmak I. Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: agronomic or genetic biofortification. Plant and soil. 2008;302:1-17.

Aravind P, Prasad MNV. Zinc alleviates cadmium-induced oxidative stress in Ceratophyllumdemersum L.: a free- floating freshwater macrophyte, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2003;41 (4):391 –397.

Pandey N, Pathak GC, Sharma CP. Zinc is critically required for pollen function and fertilisation in lentil. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology. 2006;20(2):89-96.

Mallikarjuna PR. Effect of nano nitrogen and nano zinc nutrition on nutrient uptake, growth and yield of irrigated maize during summer in the southern transition zone of Karnataka. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Keladi Shivappa Nayaka University of Agricultural Sciences Shivmogga (India); 2021.

Rajput JS, Thakur AK, Nag NK, Chandrakar T, Singh DP. Effect of nano fertilizer in relation to growth, yield and economics of little millet (Panicum sumatrense) under rainfed conditions. Pharma Innovation Journal. 2022;11 (7):153-156.

Maheta A, Gaur D, Patel S. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus nano-fertilizers on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Pharma Innovation Journal. 2023;12 (3):2965-2969.