Influence of Phosphorus and Sulphur on Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Mohd Arish *

Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, SHUATS, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Vikram Singh

Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, SHUATS, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Amit Kumar

Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, SHUATS, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Amit Raj

Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, SHUATS, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Ekta Singh

Department of Agronomy, Lucknow University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

The present field experiment was conducted during Rabi season 2024–2025 at the Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, SHUATS, Prayagraj (U.P.), using a Randomized Block Design (RBD) with ten treatments and three replications. The treatments comprised different combinations of Phosphorus (20, 40 and 60 kg/ha) and Sulphur (10, 20 and 30 kg/ha) along with a control (NPK 20-60-20 kg/ha). The results revealed that the application of Phosphorus at 60 kg/ha with Sulphur at 30 kg/ha (T9) recorded significant improvement in growth parameters, viz., plant height (52.02 cm), number of branches per plant (26.33), number of nodules per plant (32.96), plant dry weight (24.20 g) and crop growth rate (24.09 g/m²/day). The same treatment also produced the maximum yield attributes such as number of pods per plant (33.49), seeds per pod (1.33), test weight (5.93 g), which ultimately resulted in the highest grain yield (2.44 t/ha) and straw yield (4.93 t/ha). Economic analysis indicated that treatment T9 also fetched the maximum gross return (₹1,51,430/ha), net return (₹1,03,816.02/ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.18).

Keywords: Chickpea, phosphorus, Sulphur, growth, yield and economic


How to Cite

Arish, Mohd, Vikram Singh, Amit Kumar, Amit Raj, and Ekta Singh. 2025. “Influence of Phosphorus and Sulphur on Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.)”. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 37 (9):427-34. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2025/v37i95720.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.