Two-Year Evaluation of Ecofriendly Weed Management Practices and their Influence on Soil Chemical Properties and Yield in Organic Tomato

Meesala Srija *

AICRP on Weed Management Unit, Hyderabad, India.

B. Padmaja

AICRP on Weed Management Unit, Hyderabad, India.

T. Ram Prakash

RARS, Palem, India.

M. Malla Reddy

PJTAU, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India.

M. Venkateshwara Reddy

College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University (PJTAU), India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

A two-year field experiment (2022-2024), conducted under an RBD with nine treatments, evaluated eco-friendly weed management practices at PJTAU Rajendranagar, Hyderabad. The study assessed their effects on soil properties, apart from weed suppression, and crop yield. The soil pH (7.54–8.13 in 2022–2023 and 7.77–8.16 in 2023–2024) and electrical conductivity (0.58–0.63 dS m-1) remained statistically unaffected across treatments, indicating stable soil reaction and salinity under organic management. However, cation exchange capacity (CEC) showed significant variation, with rice straw mulch and hoeing treatments recording the highest values. Yield data revealed that among organic-compatible options, poly mulch with intra-row hand weeding (21.34 and 18.07 t ha⁻¹) and rice straw mulch with hand weeding (19.04 and 16.57 t ha⁻¹) were most effective, while the unweeded control resulted in the lowest yields (2.17 and 2.48 t ha⁻¹). The findings highlight the potential of mulching-based weed management as a sustainable alternative to chemical herbicides, contributing to soil health maintenance and enhanced productivity in organic tomato.

 

Keywords: pH, EC, CEC, organic farming, weed management


How to Cite

Srija, Meesala, B. Padmaja, T. Ram Prakash, M. Malla Reddy, and M. Venkateshwara Reddy. 2025. “Two-Year Evaluation of Ecofriendly Weed Management Practices and Their Influence on Soil Chemical Properties and Yield in Organic Tomato”. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 37 (12):166-73. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2025/v37i125881.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.